THE STATE OF THE WORLD FORUM
To view reflections on the September 11th
event from members of the Forum Network,
by Jim Garrison
Date: Fri, Sep 21, 2001, 10:57 AM
visit: www.worldforum.org.
On September 11, 2001,
we Americans lost our sense of invulnerability
and joined in the universality of human suffering.
Not only for a moment did the world become America,
as so many noted, but America became the world.
As we mourn our dead,
let us also mourn the frailty of the human spirit
and humanity's incapacity to be consistently humane.
As painful as our agony is here,
what America has just suffered
is what others throughout the world have experienced,
sometimes with even more devastating impact,
and sometimes at the hands of Americans.
People around the earth are caught up in a
complexity of hatreds as both victims and victimizers:
in Ireland, in the Middle East, in the Balkans,
in Rwanda, in South Africa, in Afghanistan,
in Cambodia, in Vietnam.
The list is endless.
Given the enormity of the barbarity America experienced,
the Government will certainly exact vengeance.
The destruction of the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon
were veritable acts of war against the United States.
While we plan our vengeance,
however, let us also be aware that
from the point of view of our enemies,
we are guilty of horrendous crimes against them;
thus their hatred against us.
To plan such acts as what
occurred on September 11,
with such a high degree of sophistication and precision,
are not simply the acts of madmen bent on a binge of
random destruction. They were calculated deeds
deliberatively conceived, meticulously planned
and methodically executed by men and women
of such deep conviction that they were willing to give
their very lives as instruments of the success of their
mission.
President Bush has rightly declared war against such terrorism.
We must know that Osama bin Laden is a warrior
dedicated to more than just war; he is leading a holy war
against the United States and Israel.
He is not a diplomat;
he is not a negotiator;
he is not a compromiser.
He is a man of war who, ironically,
was an ally of the CIA in the 1980s during
the war in Afghanistan against the Soviets.
He has been building his army and his tactics
for decades with an absolutism that only elevating
war to the realm of the holy can instill.
He will kill until he himself is killed.
When we eventually do this, as I assume we will, we
must
understand that in his place will arise myriad new Osama
bin Ladens,
equally committed, equally impassioned, equally ruthless.
When one
fights fire with fire, fire is not always vanquished. It
can lead to a
conflagration that burns beyond any borders, particularly
if one is
fighting a fire that is considered holy.
As we seek his demise, it is perhaps worth reflecting on
some truths
provided by the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah, now upon
us.
At the core of this commemoration of the Jewish New Year
lies the story of Deborah, a woman judge of ancient Israel,
whose leadership included the mourning of Sisera,
the General against whom the Jews of the time were fighting.
At the moment of victory against him and also in the
midst of
their grieving for their own dead,
Deborah intuited that the pain of the mothers
on the other side was just as intense as that of her own
people.
In this, she understood one of the great truths of
all religions,
that we are all one, which, if we can bear to think
the thought,
means that Osama bin Laden is us, and we are him,
and we are all made of the same dust.
Bush and bin Laden are caught up in the act of co-origination.
In a deep and mysterious way there is a deep synchronicity
of opposites coming together between them with a force that,
if we can endure and live through it, can potentially
redeem us.
Bin Ladenís attacks came against
the two icons of American power:
global capitalism in the World Trade Center
and U.S. military might in the Pentagon.
Adding insult to injury,
the hijackers used American technology
to destroy American symbols,
transforming American civilian airplanes
into guided missiles against American institutions.
Underestimating the enemy,
American intelligence was caught completely unprepared.
More deeply, the attack came against perhaps the most conservative
administration in modern American history which has been
systematically
withdrawing from all multilateral agreements and treaties
with the
exception of those which increase American economic power.
Paradoxically, the actions of September 11 were taken against
the son
of the man who organized the coalition of nations to
fight Desert Storm,
the catalytic point at which bin Laden turned his armies
against the
Untied States. History has bestowed upon George W. the task
of
organizing a coalition against the man that his fatherâs
coalition
turned into the enemy. The President who is withdrawing from
the world
in order to maximize Americaís freedom for unilateral
actions in the
world has been met by the ultimate unilateralist: bin Laden.
The superpower has met the super-empowered individual.
To succeed, Bush the unilateralist must become the premier
multilateralist. He must forge a coalition of nations against
world
terrorism like the world is trying to forge to deal with
global warming,
nuclear disarmament, trafficking in small arms, chemical
and biological
weapons, all coalitions and treaties from which he has disengaged.
Perhaps the ultimate irony of this complex set of interactions
is that
this Administration might learn that global cooperation and
global
governance, meaning the alignments of nation states around
rules and
norms for international priorities, deliberation and commerce,
actually
serve the national security interests of the United States
rather than threaten them.
Working within the complexity of coalitions
might enable us to tackle another complexity:
that the war against terrorism can only be truly won
when we also declare war on the roots which cause such acts
of
barbarity: poverty, illiteracy, injustice, and disease.
Terrorism does not arise in a vacuum
but has it roots in historical, political, social
and economic dysfunctions so deep, so cruel,
so systemic that they create and sustain discontent
until it spills over into a desperation that sees no
recourse
other than wanton destruction against those perceived
as responsible for the plight of the terrorists.
Unless there is an equally dedicated attack
on the causes of terrorism,
there will never be victory
in the war against terrorism.
Let us meet our measure of vengeance
therefore with an equal measure of mercy.
In so doing, perhaps we can come to realize that the
world
is not simply a rough terrain that needs to be made flat
in order to enable the global corporations,
financial interests and entertainment industry
to have a richer harvest.
While good for business, free trade zones may not
do justice to the complexity of the world ecology with all
its voices,
cultures, histories and traditions, all of which have their
own unique
legitimacy and all of which must be given their rightful
place of honor.
While at the level of politics we seek victory over terrorists,
at the level of healing our redemption might come with
our
willingness to grapple with the complexities occurring around
us:
that when opposites collide, they co-create;
and it is precisely our ability to hold the opposites
in a spirit of empathy and humility that generates
the capacity for the redemption we seek.
If out of the present crisis the United States emerges
more connected with the rest of the world,
more willing to compromise national sovereignty
within the context of the needs of the larger community
of nations,
more willing to live cooperatively within coalitions than
outside them,
then light will have truly come from out of the darkness
and redemption out of the recesses of hatred and war.
In one of the deepest paradoxes of contemporary history,
the present crisis might compel America to reconnect
with the
wellspring of values the rest of the world intuits
it needs Americaís leadership in order to achieve.
If we can attain this level of understanding, we will have
learned the
wisdom of limits, that in an increasingly complex and interdependent
world, no country is an island unique unto itself; and, since
there are
no longer frontiers to war, the only sustainable solution
to hate is to
stop the underlying causes that produce it, working within
the community
of nations to achieve goals that benefit the poor as well
as the rich,
the south as well as the north, the developing nations as
well as those
more advanced. Achieving this, America will fulfill
the deepest
yearning of one of its founding fathers,
Benjamin Franklin, who wrote that he believed the real
destiny of America would not be about power;
it would be about light.
These thoughts I pass your way, keenly aware that many might
disagree.
I am deeply sensitive to the fact that wisdom is a very elusive
thing.
We often have the experience but miss the meaning.
It invariably comes slowly, painfully, and only after deep
reflection.
This is to say that my thoughts now will change
as my subjective interaction with the event itself changes,
as they will with the passage of time and the constant
ebb and flow of the world situation.
In a year we will all look back on September 11
and view it completely differently than we do today.
Let us all be humbled by this
and modulate our certainties accordingly;
let us engage with each other
with deepened empathy and compassion.