This wasn't something I came to casually, by the way.
It's the big political story of the last quarter
century,
and I started reporting it as a journalist in the
late 70s
with the first television documentary
about political action committees.
More recently, at the Florence and
John Schumann Foundation,
working with my colleague and son, John Moyers,
we saw how environmental causes were being overwhelmed
by the private funding of elections that gives
big donors unequal and undeserved political influence.
That's why over the past five years
the Schumann brothers-Robert and Ford
and our board have poured both income and
principle into political reform through the
Clean Money Initiative-the public funding of elections.
I intended to talk about this-about
the soul of democracy-
and then connect it to my television efforts
and your environmental work.
That was my intention.
That's the speech I was working on six weeks ago.
But I'm not the same man I was six weeks ago.
And you're not the same audience
for whom I was preparing those remarks.
We've all been changed
by what happened on September 11.
My friend, Thomas Hearne, the president
of Wake Forest University, reminded me recently
that while the clock and the calendar make it seem
as if our lives unfold hour by hour, day by day,
our passage is marked by events-of celebration
and crisis.
We share those in common.
They create the memories which make of us a history,
and make of us a people, a nation.
Pearl Harbor was that event for my parents' generation.
It changed their world, and it changed them. They
never forgot the moment when the news reached them.
For my generation it was the assassinations
of the Kennedys and Martin Luther King,
the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church,
the dogs and fire hose in Alabama.
Those events broke our hearts. We healed, but scars
remain.
For this generation,
that moment will be September 11th,
2001-the worst act of terrorism in our nation's history.
It has changed the country. It has changed
us.
That's what terrorists intend.
Terrorists don't want to own our land,
wealth, monuments, buildings, fields, or streams.
They're not after tangible property.
Sure, they aim to annihilate the targets they strike.
But their real goal is to get inside our heads, our psyche,
and to deprive us-the survivors-
of peace of mind, of trust, of faith;
they aim to prevent us from believing again
in a world of mercy, justice, and love,
or working to bring that better world to pass.
This is their real target,
to turn our imaginations into Afghanistans,
where they can rule by fear.
Once they possess us, they are hard to exorcise.
This summer our daughter and son-in-law
adopted a baby boy. On September 11th
our son-in-law passed through
the shadow of the World Trade Center
to his office up the block.
He got there in time to see the eruption of fire
and smoke.
He saw the falling bodies.
He saw the people jumping to their deaths.
and for long awful moments he couldn't reach his wife,
our daughter, to say he was okay. She was
in agony
until he finally got through-and even then
he couldn't get home to his family until the next morning.
It took him several days fully to get his legs back.
Now, in a matter-of-fact voice, our daughter tells us
how she often lies awake at night,
wondering where and when it might happen again,
going to the computer at three in the morning-
her baby asleep in the next room-
to check out what she can about bioterrorism,
germ warfare, anthrax, and the vulnerability of children.
Beyond the carnage left by the sneak attack
terrorists create another kind of havoc,
invading and despoiling a new mother's
deepest space, holding her imagination hostage
to the most dreadful possibilities.
None of us is spared. The building where
my wife and I produce our television programs
is in midtown Manhattan, just over a mile from
ground zero.
It was evacuated immediately after the disaster
although the two of us remained with other colleagues
to help keep the station on the air.
Our building was evacuated again late in the evening
a day later because of a bomb scare at
the Empire State building nearby.
We had just ended a live broadcast for PBS
when the security officers swept through and
ordered everyone out of the building.
As we were making our way down the stairs
I took Judith's arm and was suddenly struck by
the thought: is this the last time I'll touch her?
Could our marriage of almost fifty years end here,
on this dim and bare staircase?
I ejected the thought forcibly from my mind,
like a bouncer removing a rude intruder; I shoved
it out of my consciousness by sheer force of will.
But in the first hours of morning, it crept back.
Returning from Washington on the train last week,
I looked up and for the first time in days saw
a plane
in the sky. And then another, and another-
not nearly as many as I used to on that same journey.
But so help me, every plane I saw, & every plane
I see today,
invokes unwelcome images and terrifying thoughts.
Unwelcome images, terrifying thoughts:
time bombs planted in our heads by terrorists,
our own private Terrorisms.
I wish I could find the wisdom in this.
Then our time together this morning
might have been more profitable for you.
But wisdom is a very elusive thing.
Someone told me once
that we often have the experience but miss the
wisdom.
Wisdom comes,
if at all, slowly, painfully, and only after deep reflection.
Perhaps when we gather next year the wisdom will
have arranged itself like the beautiful colors
of a stilled kaleidoscope, and we will look back
on September 11 and see it differently.
But I haven't been ready for reflection.
I have wanted to stay busy, on the go, or on the run,
perhaps, from the need to cope with the reality
that just
a few subway stops south of where I get off at Penn Station
in midtown Manhattan, five thousand people died
in a matter of minutes. One minute they're pulling off
their jackets, shaking Sweet 'n Low into their coffee,
adjusting the picture of a child or sweetheart
or spouse in a
frame on their desk, booting up their computer-
and in the next, it's all over for them.
I've been collecting obituaries of the victims.
Practically every day the New York Times
runs compelling little profiles of the dead and
missing,
and I've been keeping them. Not out of some macabre desire
to stare at death, but to see if I might recognize
a face,
a name, some old acquaintance, a former colleague,
even a stranger I might have seen occasionally
on the subway or street. That was my original purpose.
But as the file has grown I realize
what an amazing montage it is of life,
an unforgettable portrait of the America
those terrorists wanted to shatter.
I study each little story for its contribution
to the mosaic
of my country, its particular revelation about
the nature of democracy,
the people with whom we share it.
~ Luis Bautista was one. It was his birthday,
and he had the day off from Windows on the World,
the restaurant high atop the World Trade Center.
But back home in Peru his family depended on Luis
for the money he had been sending them since he
arrived
in New York two years ago speaking only Spanish,
and there was the tuition he would soon be paying
to study at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
So on the eleventh of September
Luis Bautista was putting in overtime. He was 24.
~ William Steckman was 56. For thirty five of those
years
he took care of NBC's transmitter at One World Trade
Center, working the night shift because it let him spend time
during the day with his five children and to fix
things
up around the house. His shift ended at six a.m. but
this
morning his boss asked him to stay on to help install
some new equipment, and William Steckman said sure.
~
~ Elizabeth Holmes lived in Harlem with her son
and jogged every morning around Central Park
where I often go walking, and I have been wondering
if Elizabeth Holmes and I perhaps crossed paths
some morning. I figure we were kindred souls.
She too, was a Baptist, and sang in the choir
at the Canaan Baptist church.
She was expecting a ring from her fiancé
at Christmas.
~ Linda Luzzicone and Ralph Gerhardt were planning
their wedding, too. They had both sets of parents
come to New York in August to meet for the first
time
and talk about the plans. They had discovered each other
in nearby cubicles on the 104th floor of
One World Trade Center and fell in love.
They were working there when the terrorists struck.
~ Mon Jahn-bul-lie came here from Albania.
Because his name was hard to pronounce his friends
called him by the Cajun "Jambalay" and he grew to like
it.
He lived with his three sons in the Bronx and was
supposed to have retired when he turned 65 last year,
but he was so attached to the building and so enjoyed
the company of the other janitors that he often
showed up
an hour before work just to shoot the bull.
In my mind's eye I can see him that morning,
horsing around with his buddies.
~ Fred Scheffold liked his job, too-
Chief of the 12th battalion in Harlem.
He loved going into fires and he loved his men.
But he never told his daughters in the suburbs
about the bad stuff in all the fires he had fought
over the years. He didn't want to worry them.
This morning, his shift had just ended
and he was starting home when the alarm rang.
He jumped into the truck with the others and at
One World Trade Center he pushed through the crowds
to the staircase heading for the top. The
last time
anyone saw him alive he was heading for the top.
While hundreds poured past him going down through
the flames and smoke, Fred Scheffold just kept going
up.
Now you know why I can't give the speech I was working
on.
Talking about my work in television would be too parochial.
And what's happened since the attacks would seem
to put the lie to my fears about the soul of democracy.
Americans have rallied together in a way that I
cannot remember since World War Two.
In real and instinctive ways we have felt touched?
singed -- by the fires that brought down those
buildings,
even those of us who did not directly lose a loved one.
Great and low alike, we have been humbled by
a renewed sense of our common mortality.
Those planes the terrorists turned into suicide bombers
cut through a complete cross-section of America-
stockbrokers and dishwashers, bankers and secretaries,
lawyers & janitors, Hollywood producers &
new immigrants,
urbanites and suburbanites alike.
One community near where I live in New Jersey
lost twenty-three residents. A single church near our
home lost eleven members of the congregation.
Eighty nations are represented among the dead.
This catastrophe has reminded us of a basic
truth at the heart of our democracy:
no matter our wealth or status or faith,
we are all equal before the law,
in the voting booth, and when
death rains down from the sky.
We have also been reminded that despite
years of scandals and political corruption,
despite the stream of stories of personal greed
and pirates in Gucci's scamming the treasury,
despite the retreat from the public sphere
and the turn toward private privilege,
despite squalor for the poor and gated communities
for the rich, we have been reminded that the great mass
of Americans have not yet given up on the idea
of 'We, the People.'
And they have refused to accept the notion,
promoted so diligently by our friends at the
Heritage Foundation and by Grover Norquist
and his right-wing ilk, that government-
the public service- should be shrunk to a size
where they can drown it in the bathtub
(that's what Norquist said is their goal.)
These right-wingers at Heritage and elsewhere,
by the way, earlier this year teamed up
with the deep-pocket bankers who finance them,
to stop the United States from cracking down on
Terroristâs Money Havens.
As TIME Magazine reports, thirty industrial nations
were ready to tighten the screws on offshore
financial centers whose banks have the potential
to hide and often help launder billions of dollars
for drug cartels, global crime syndicates-
and groups like Osama bin Laden's Al-Quaeda organization.
Not all off-shore money is linked to crime or terrorism;
much of it comes from wealthy people
who are hiding money to avoid taxation. And
right-wingers believe in nothing if not in avoiding
taxation.
So they and the bankers' lobbyists went to work
to stop the American government from participating
in the crackdown on dirty money, arguing that
closing down tax havens in effect leads to higher taxes
on the poor people trying to hide their money.
I am not kidding; it's all on the record.
The president of the Heritage Foundation spent an hour,
according to the New York Times,
with Treasury Secretary O'Neill, and Texas bankers
pulled their strings at the White House, and presto,
the Bush administration folded and pulled out
of the international campaign against tax havens.
How about that for patriotism?
Better terrorists get their dirty money
than tax cheaters be prevented from hiding their money.
And that from people who wrap themselves
in the flag and sing the Star Spangled Banner with
gusto.
These true believers in the god of the market
would leave us to the ruthless cruelty of
unfettered monopolistic capital where even the
law of the jungle breaks down.
But listen: today's heroes are public servants.
The twenty-year-old dot.com instant millionaires
and the pugnacious pundits of tabloid television
and the crafty celebrity stock pickers on the cable channels
have all been exposed for what they are-
barnacles on the hulk of the great ship of state.
In their stead we have those brave firefighters and policemen
and Port Authority workers and emergency rescue personnel,
public employees all,
most of them drawing a modest middle-class income
for extremely dangerous work. They have caught
our imaginations not only for their heroic deeds
but because we know so many people like them,
people we took for granted.
For once, our TV screens have been filled
with the modest declarations of average Americans
coming to each other's aid.
I find this good, and thrilling, and sobering.
It could offer a new beginning, a renewal of civil
values
that could leave our society stronger and more
together
than ever, working on common goals for the public good.
The playwright Tony Kushner wrote more than a decade ago:
'There are moments in history when the fabric of everyday
life unravels,
and there is this unstable dynamism that allows
for incredible social change in short periods of time.
People and the world they're living in can be utterly
transformed,
either for the good or the bad, or some mixture of the
two.'
He's right. This could go either way.
Here's one sighting:
in the wake of September 11th;
there's been a heartening change in how Americans view
their government.
For the first time in more than thirty years
a majority of people say we trust the Federal Government
to do the right thing 'just about always' or at least
'most of the time.' It's as if the clock has been rolled
back
to the early sixties, before Vietnam and Watergate
took such a toll on the gross national psychology.
This newfound hope for public collaboration
is based in part on how people view what the
government has done in response to the attacks.
I have to say that overall, President Bush has acted
with commendable resolve and restraint.
But this is a case where yet again
the people are ahead of the politicians.
They're expressing greater faith in government
right now
because the long-standing gap between our ruling elites
and ordinary citizens has seemingly disappeared.
To most Americans, government right now doesn't
mean
a faceless bureaucrat or a politician
auctioning access to the highest bidder.
It means a courageous rescuer or brave soldier.
Instead of representatives spending their evenings
clinking glasses with fat cats,
they are out walking among the wounded.
In Washington it seemed momentarily possible
that the political class had been jolted out of old habits.
Some old partisan rivalries and arguments
fell by the wayside as our representatives acted
decisively
on a forty billion dollar fund to rebuild New York.
Adversaries like Dennis Hastert and Dick Gephardt
were linking arms. There was even a ten-day moratorium
on political fundraisers. I was beginning to be optimistic
that the mercenary culture of Washington
might finally be on its knees.
But I once asked a friend on Wall Street
what he thought about the market. "I'm optimistic," he
said.
"Then why do you look so worried?" And he answered:
"Because I'm not sure my optimism is justified."
I'm not, either. There are, alas, other sightings to
report.
It didn't take long for the wartime opportunists-
the mercenaries of Washington, the lobbyists, lawyers,
and
political fundraisers-to crawl out of their offices
on K Street
determined to grab what they can for their clients.
While in New York we are still attending memorial services
for firemen and police, while everywhere Americans'
cheeks are still stained with tears,
while the President calls for patriotism,
prayers and piety, the predators of Washington
are up to their old tricks in the pursuit of
private plunder at public expense.
In the wake of this awful tragedy
wrought by terrorism, they are cashing in.
Would you like to know the memorial
they would offer the almost six thousand people
who died in the attacks? Or the legacy they would provide
the ten thousand children who lost a parent in the horror?
How do they propose to fight the long and costly
war on terrorism America must now undertake?
Why, restore the three-martini lunch-
that will surely strike fear in the heart of Osama bin
Laden. You think I'm kidding, but bringing back the
deductible lunch is one of the proposals on the table
in Washington right now. There are members of Congress
who believe you should sacrifice in this time of crisis
by paying for lobbyists' long lunches.
And cut capital gains for the wealthy,
naturally-that's America's patriotic duty, too.
And while we're at it, don't forget to eliminate
the Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax,
enacted fifteen years ago to prevent corporations
from taking so many credits and deductions
that they owed little if any taxes.
But don't just repeal their minimum tax;
give those corporations a refund for all the
minimum tax they have ever been assessed.
You look ~ incredulous.
But that's taking place in Washington even as we
meet here in Brainerd this morning.
What else can America do to strike at the terrorists?
Why, slip in a special tax break for poor General
Electric,
and slip inside the Environmental Protection Agency
while everyone's distracted and torpedo the
resent order to clean the Hudson River of PCBs.
Don't worry about NBC, CNBC, or MSNBC reporting
it;
they're all in the GE family.
It's time for Churchillian courage, we're told.
So how would this crowd assure that future generations
will look back and say 'This was their finest hour'?
That's easy. Give those coal producers freedom
to pollute.
And shovel generous tax breaks to those
giant energy companies;
and open the Alaskan wilderness to drilling- that's
something to remember the 11th of September for.
And while the red, white and blue wave at half-mast
over the land of the free and the home of the brave-
why, give the President the power to
discard democratic debate and the rule-of-law
concerning controversial trade agreements,
and set up secret tribunals to
run roughshod over local communities
trying to protect their environment and their health.
It's happening as we meet.
It's happening right now.
If I sound a little bitter about this, I am;
the President rightly appeals every day for sacrifice.
But to these mercenaries sacrifice is for suckers.
So I am bitter, yes, and sad.
Our business and political class owes us better than
this.
After all, it was they who declared class
war twenty years ago and it was they who won.
They're on top.
If ever they were going to put patriotism over
profits,
if ever they were going to practice the magnanimity
of winners, this was the moment.
o hide now behind the flag while
ripping off a country in crisis fatally -
fatally! separates them from
the common course of American life.
Some things just don't change.
Once again the Republican Party has lived
down to Harry Truman's description of
the GOP as guardians of privilege.
And as for Truman's Democratic Party-
the party of the New Deal and the Fair Deal-well,
it breaks my heart to report that the
Democratic National Committee has used
the terrorist attacks to call for widening the soft
money loophole in our election laws.
How about that for a patriotic response to terrorism?
Mencken got it right-the journalist H. L. Mencken,
who said that when you hear some men talk
about their love of country,
it's a sign they expect to be paid for it.
Understandably, in the hours after the attacks
many environmental organizations stepped down
from aggressively pressing their issues.
Greenpeace canceled its 30th anniversary celebration.
The Sierra Club stopped all advertising,
phone banks and mailing.
The Environmental Working Group
and the PIRGs postponed a national report
on chlorination in drinking water.
That was the proper way to observe a period of
mourning.
Furthermore, in work like this you have to read
and respect the mood of a country in crisis,
or a misspoken word, even a modest misstep,
could lose you the public's ear for years to come.
But the polluters and their political cronies
accepted no such constraints.
Just one day after the attack,
one day into the maelstrom of horror,
loss, and grief, Republican senators
called for prompt consideration of the
President's proposal to subsidize the country's largest
and richest energy companies.
While America was mourning they were marauding.
One congressman even suggested that eco-terrorists
might be behind the attacks. And with that smear he
and his kind went on the offensive in Congress,
attempting to attach to a defense bill massive
subsidies for the oil, coal, gas and nuclear companies.
To a defense bill!
What a shameless insult to patriotism!
What a slander on the sacrifice of our armed forces!
To pile corporate welfare totaling billions of dollars
onto a defense bill in an emergency like this
is repugnant to the nostrils
and a scandal against democracy!
But this is their game.
They're counting on your patriotism
to distract you from their plunder.
They're counting on you to be standing at
attention with your hand over your heart,
pledging allegiance to the flag,
while they pick your pocket!
Let's face it:
they present citizens with no options
but to climb back in the ring.
We are in what educators call
"a teachable moment."
And we'll lose it if we roll over and shut up.
What's at stake
is democracy.
Democracy wasn't canceled on the 11th of September,
but democracy won't survive if citizens turn into
lemmings.
Yes, the President is our Commander-in-chief,
and in hunting down and destroying the terrorists
who are trying to destroy us,
we are "all the President's men"
-as Henry Kissinger put it after the bombing of Cambodia.
But we are not the President's minions.
If in the name of the war on terrorism
President Bush hands the state over
to the energy industry, it's every patriot's
duty to join the local opposition.
Even in war, politics is about who
gets what and who doesn't.
If the mercenaries in Washington try to
exploit the emergency and America's good faith
to grab what they wouldn't get through open debate
in peace time, the disloyalty will not be in our
dissent but in our subservience.
The greatest sedition would be our silence.
Yes, there's a fight going on-against terrorists
around the globe, but just as certainly
there's a fight going on here at home,
to decide the kind of country this will be
during and after the war on terrorism.
To the Irishman's question-
'Is this a private fight or can anyone get in it?"
the answer has to be: "Come on in.
It's our economy, our environment, our country,
and our future. If we don't fight, who will?"
What should our strategy be?
Here are a couple of suggestions.
During two trips to Washington in the last ten days
I heard people talking mostly
about two big issues of policy:
economic stimulus and the national security.
How do we renew our economy
and safeguard our nation?
Guess what? Those are your issues,
and you are uniquely equipped to address them
with powerful language and persuasive argument.
For example:
if you want to fight for the environment,
don't hug a tree; hug an economist.
Hug the economist who tells you that fossil fuels
are not only the third most heavily subsidized
economic sector after road transportation
and agriculture-they also promote vast inefficiencies.
Hug the economist who tells you that the
most efficient investment of a dollar
is not in fossil fuels but in renewable energy
sources
that not only provide new jobs but cost less over time.
Hug the economist who tells you that the
price system matters;
it's potentially the most potent tool of all
for creating social change.
Look what California did this
summer in responding to its recent energy crisis
with a price structure that rewards those
who conserve and punishes those who don't.
Californians cut their electric consumption by up to
15%.
Do we want to send the terrorists a message?
Go for conservation.
Go for clean, home-grown energy.
And go for public health.
If we reduce emissions from fossil fuel,
we will cut the rate of asthma among children.
Healthier children and a healthier economy-
how about that as a response to terrorism?
As for national security, well,
it's time to expose the energy plan
before Congress for the dinosaur it is.
Everyone knows America needs to
reduce our reliance on fossil fuel.
But this energy plan is more of the same:
more subsidies for the rich,
more pollution, more waste,
more inefficiency.
Let's get the message out.
Start with John Adams' wakeup call.
The head of NRDC says the terrorist attacks
spell out in frightful terms that America's unchecked
consumption of oil has become our Achilles heel.
It constrains our military options in the face of terror.
It leaves our economy dangerously vulnerable to price
shocks.
It invites environmental degradation, ecological
disasters,
and potentially catastrophic climate change.
Go to Tompaine.com
and you will find the two simple facts
we need to get to the American people:
first, the money we pay at the gasoline pump
helps prop up oil-rich sponsors of terrorism
like Saddam Hussein and Muammar al-Quaddifi.
Second, a big reason we spend so much money
policing the Middle East-$30 billion every year,
has to do with our dependence on the oil there.
So John Adams got it right -
the single most important thing environmentalists
can do to ensure America's national security
is to fight to reduce our nation's dependence on oil,
whether imported or domestic.
But don't stop there.
Before the 11th of September
the nuclear power industry was salivating at the prospect
of the government giving it limited liability for the
risks
of the meltdown or other nuclear accident.
We were told by Vice President Cheney
that nuclear power was a "safe technology"
that could help alleviate energy shortages
and not contribute to greenhouse gases.
But when Dick Cheney invited the energy companies
and their lobbyists to write his energy plan,
he didn't reckon on terrorism
or the advice of Harvey Wassermann.
Harvey Wassermann has spent years studying these
issues
and writing about America's experience with atomic radiation.
He tells us that one or both planes
that crashed into the World Trade Center
could easily have obliterated
the two atomic reactors
now operating at Indian Point,
about 40 miles up the Hudson River.
Regulations put out by the nuclear regulatory commission
regarding plant safety don't address that sort of event,
and neither plant was designed to withstand such
crashes.
Until now Harvey Wassermann's scenario was unthinkable.
Had one or both of those jets hit one or both
of the operating reactors at Indian Point,
the ensuing cloud of radiation would have
dwarfed the ones at Hiroshima, Nagasaki,
Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.
At the very least the massive impact
and hellish jet fuel fire would destroy the human
ability to control the plants' functions.
Vital cooling systems, back-up power generators
and communications networks would crumble.
The assault would not require a large jet.
The safety systems are extremely complex
and virtually indefensible.
One or more could be wiped out with a wide
range of easily deployed small aircraft,
ground-based weapons, truck bombs
or even chemical/biological assaults
aimed at the operating work force.
Dozens of US reactors have repeatedly failed
even modest security tests over the years.
And even heightened wartime standards
cannot guarantee protection of the vast,
supremely sensitive controls required for reactor safety.
Without continuous monitoring and guaranteed water
flow,
the thousands of tons of radioactive rods in the cores
and the thousands more stored in those fragile
pools
would rapidly melt into super-hot radioactive
balls of lava that would burn into the ground
and the water table and, ultimately, the Hudson.
Striking water, they would blast gigantic billows
of horribly radioactive steam into the atmosphere.
The radioactive clouds would then enshroud New York,
New Jersey, New England, and carry deep into the
Atlantic and up
into Canada and across to Europe and around the globe
again and again.
This is what we missed by a mere forty miles
near New York City on September 11th.
And remember-there are 103 of these potential bombs
of the apocalypse now operating in the United States.
103 Nukes.
I know you see what we're up against.
I know you get it-the work that we must do.
It's why you mustn't lose heart.
Your adversaries will call you unpatriotic
for speaking the truth when conformity reigns.
Ideologues will smear you for
challenging the official view of reality.
Mainstream media will ignore you,
and those gasbags on cable TV
and the radio talk shows will ridicule and vilify you.
But I urge you to hold to these words:
"In the course of fighting the present fire,
we must not abandon our efforts to create
fire-resistant structures of the future."
Those words were written by my
friend Randy Kehler more than ten years ago,
By Bill Moyers